Huawei MDF-XX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (2nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 98 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics7.58% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
8 months ago, 8 months ago.
SystemHuawei MDF-XX  (all builds)
MotherboardHUAWEI MDF-XX-PCB
Memory8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230420
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 03 '23 at 01:59
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1240P
CPU0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
53.5% Above average
Memory 56.6
1-Core 104
2-Core 196
65% 119 Pts
4-Core 290
8-Core 294
39% 292 Pts
64-Core 249
15% 249 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Device(19E5 3E68) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3729
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
7.58% Terrible
Lighting 12.6
Reflection 20.2
Parallax 15
10% 15.9 fps
MRender 1.4
Gravity 8.1
Splatting 0.1
2% 3.2 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 7.58%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD Device 512GB
350GB free (System drive)
Firmware: YM00D217
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2767
Write 2,150
Mixed 900
427% 1,939 MB/s
4K Read 39.4
4K Write 152
4K Mixed 64.1
222% 85.1 MB/s
DQ Read 782
DQ Write 1,389
DQ Mixed 534
561% 902 MB/s
Poor: 153% Great: 305%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 123GB
9GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 38.1
Write 15.7
Mixed 21.1
28% 25 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1.5
130% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
NULL K4UBE3D4AA-MGCR 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 4267 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
71.1% Very good
MC Read 25.7
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 34.4
80% 28.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 14.6
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 137
29% 137 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 137%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 0 7.2" 1280 720 GSM0001 LG TV
Typical MDF-XX Builds (Compare 37 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

System: Huawei MDF-XX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback