Asus G73Sw

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive79.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus G73Sw  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G73Sw
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110210
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateOct 02 '23 at 18:20
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2630QM-$199
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
57.7% Above average
Memory 76.5
1-Core 68.2
2-Core 132
56% 92.3 Pts
4-Core 211
8-Core 305
32% 258 Pts
64-Core 310
19% 310 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 460M
Asus(1043 2048) 1GB
CLim: 675 MHz, MLim: 625 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.73
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
5.5% Terrible
Lighting 6.1
Reflection 9
Parallax 6.9
5% 7.33 fps
MRender 9.1
Gravity 7.8
Splatting 7.3
6% 8.07 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.5%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 343 132 130 130 131 126 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
79.1% Very good
Read 470
Write 451
Mixed 357
SusWrite 165
81% 361 MB/s
4K Read 31.4
4K Write 49.4
4K Mixed 38.2
123% 39.7 MB/s
DQ Read 282
DQ Write 245
DQ Mixed 260
196% 262 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 124%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 750GB (2010)-$70
419GB free
Firmware: 0002SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 74 74 73 74 76 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
44.2% Average
Read 80.7
Write 78.4
Mixed 31.9
SusWrite 73.4
48% 66.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.3
62% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 62%
WD Elements 2621 5TB
4TB free, PID 2621
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 25 24 25 26 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
14.6% Very poor
Read 54.5
Write 25.1
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 25.2
38% 31.8 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.8
45% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5773CHS-CH9 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
46.5% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 15.1
47% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 13
SC Mixed 13.9
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 87.1
46% 87.1 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 31.5" 1280 720 SAM0F94 U32R59x
Typical G73Sw Builds (Compare 160 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus G73Sw

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $199
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4070 $515Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback