HP 240 G2 Notebook PC

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 29% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	2.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	24.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP 240 G2 Notebook PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 218B
Memory	13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140321
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 02 '23 at 15:21
Run Duration	146 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-3110M-$70 34,445 User benchmarks, average bench 48% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	27.9% Poor	Memory 45.3 1-Core 26.2 2-Core 41.5 26% 37.7 Pts	4-Core 61.7 8-Core 71.6 9% 66.7 Pts	64-Core 73.6 5% 73.6 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 27.9% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% HP(103C 218B) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	2.78% Terrible	Lighting 3.4 Reflection 1.8 Parallax 2.4 3% 2.53 fps	MRender 4.1 Gravity 2 Splatting 4 3% 3.37 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.78% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35 80,916 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 59GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3J96R9 SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 100 59 52 60 55 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	24.5% Poor	Read 142 Write 133 Mixed 136 SusWrite 81 28% 123 MB/s	4K Read 2 4K Write 15.4 4K Mixed 11 25% 9.47 MB/s	DQ Read 127 DQ Write 119 DQ Mixed 76 70% 107 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 24.5% Great: 82%
Seagate ST500LM012 HN-M500MBB 500GB 47,588 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 466GB free Firmware: 2BA30001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 109 108 107 107 109 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	57.8% Above average	Read 95.2 Write 70.5 Mixed 62.3 SusWrite 106 62% 83.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 141% 1 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 57.8% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905428-416.A00LF 2x8GB 321 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	26.2% Poor	MC Read 8.6 MC Write 11.2 MC Mixed 8.8 27% 9.53 GB/s	SC Read 6.3 SC Write 6.5 SC Mixed 6.7 19% 6.5 GB/s	Latency 180 22% 180 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 26.2% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	28	6	60	14"	1280 720	SEC345A

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 240 G2 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: HP 240 G2 Notebook PC

CPU
Core i3-3110MIntel $70Bench 48%, 34,445 samples	31x
Core i7-3630QMIntel $420Bench 61%, 65,927 samples	1x
Core i7-2630QMIntel $199Bench 55%, 39,605 samples	1x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	33x
HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 90,156 samples	1x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	1x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	4x
GP-GSTFS31480GNTD 480GBGigabyteBench 78%, 7,834 samples	2x
PLUS 120GBSandiskBench 43%, 16,974 samples	2x

RAM
SH564128FJ8NWRNSQG 1x4GBSmartBench 27%, 2,672 samples	5x
HP16D3LS1KFG/4G 1x4GBKingstonBench 24%, 3,830 samples	2x
SH564128FJ8NWRNSQG 2x4GBSmartBench 48%, 2,408 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $98

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16