Asus H81M-C/BR

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 51% Yacht	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	35.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus H81M-C/BR (all builds)
Memory	2.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150309
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 02 '23 at 14:25
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	56%

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1220 v3-$104 5,273 User benchmarks, average bench 69% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	51.9% Above average	Memory 75.4 1-Core 66.5 2-Core 123 54% 88.3 Pts	4-Core 166 8-Core 173 22% 170 Pts	64-Core 190 12% 190 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 51.9% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610 62,458 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Nvidia(10DE 0915) 1GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.49% Terrible	Lighting 1.7 Reflection 2.2 Parallax 0.3 1% 1.4 fps	MRender 2.1 Gravity 2.3 Splatting 1.9 2% 2.1 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.49% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 120GB 120GB 4,995 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 35GB free (System drive) Firmware: 6A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 39 36 19 39 37 MB/s Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	35.8% Below average	Read 228 Write 205 Mixed 42.1 SusWrite 55.7 29% 133 MB/s	4K Read 19.1 4K Write 21.2 4K Mixed 11.6 55% 17.3 MB/s	DQ Read 138 DQ Write 175 DQ Mixed 2 44% 105 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 35.8% Great: 81%
SSD 1TB 1TB 1,423 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 680GB free Firmware: 704D SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 195 195 185 212 208 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	57.4% Above average	Read 370 Write 203 Mixed 253 SusWrite 199 57% 256 MB/s	4K Read 19.8 4K Write 56.3 4K Mixed 9.4 72% 28.5 MB/s	DQ Read 181 DQ Write 267 DQ Mixed 14.3 70% 154 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 57.4% Great: 259%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown SH564128FH8N0TNSDR 8GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1600, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	34.9% Below average	MC Read 12 MC Write 12 MC Mixed 11.7 34% 11.9 GB/s	SC Read 9.1 SC Write 12.2 SC Mixed 11.3 31% 10.9 GB/s	Latency 102 39% 102 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 34.9% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	36	17	60	27.5"	1280 720	SAM0B32 SAMSUNG

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H81M-C/BR Builds (Compare 321 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-C/BR

CPU
Core i5-4440Intel $99Bench 61%, 81,111 samples	55x
Core i3-4170Intel $20Bench 57%, 48,178 samples	35x
Core i3-4160Intel $79Bench 55%, 48,506 samples	26x

GPU
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples	29x
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	28x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	25x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	29x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	24x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	20x

RAM
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	8x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	7x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $127

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16