Alienware ASM100

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics16.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
8 months ago, 8 months ago.
SystemAlienware ASM100  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 03V3TG
Memory13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190531
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 02 '23 at 14:14
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
57.5% Above average
Memory 77.7
1-Core 82.2
2-Core 142
61% 101 Pts
4-Core 214
8-Core 236
30% 225 Pts
64-Core 239
15% 239 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GPU
Dell(1028 066A) 2GB
CLim: 1097 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.25
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Lighting 20
Reflection 16.5
Parallax 18.7
16% 18.4 fps
MRender 22.5
Gravity 21.9
Splatting 14.9
16% 19.8 fps
Poor: 14%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
422GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 474
Write 355
Mixed 306
84% 379 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 94.5
4K Mixed 31.5
137% 52.2 MB/s
DQ Read 355
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 253
213% 310 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
SanDisk Cruzer Facet 8GB
2GB free, PID 5576
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 26.8
Write 5
Mixed 15.7
17% 15.8 MB/s
4K Read 5.8
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 2.4
124% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73EB0-YK0 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
57.4% Above average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 22.9
MC Mixed 17.9
59% 20.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 17.6
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 86.4
46% 86.4 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 72.3" 1280 720 GSM0001 LG TV
Typical ASM100 Builds (Compare 543 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Alienware ASM100

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $136
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback