Gigabyte GA-H61MA-D2V

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics19.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
10 months ago, 8 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H61MA-D2V  (all builds)
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140225
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 02 '23 at 11:09
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2320-$165
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2320 CPU @ 3.00GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
62% Good
Memory 81.1
1-Core 81.4
2-Core 150
62% 104 Pts
4-Core 244
8-Core 281
34% 262 Pts
64-Core 296
18% 296 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 62%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760 (192-bit)
HP(103C 6892) 1.5GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 474.14
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
19.9% Very poor
Lighting 22.1
Reflection 25.7
Parallax 31.8
18% 26.5 fps
MRender 33.2
Gravity 29
Splatting 25.3
23% 29.2 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ct500mx5 0 500GB
252GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 240 250 261 264 265 MB/s
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
75.1% Very good
Read 283
Write 148
Mixed 266
SusWrite 246
53% 236 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 54.6
4K Mixed 39.5
128% 42 MB/s
DQ Read 214
DQ Write 182
DQ Mixed 146
124% 181 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 119%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$97
1TB free
Firmware: MX6O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 150 138 164 149 165 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
96.6% Outstanding
Read 189
Write 172
Mixed 34.2
SusWrite 148
98% 136 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
187% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 96.6%
Great: 108%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
675GB free
Firmware: MX6O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 58 85 49 73 49 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
58% Above average
Read 141
Write 118
Mixed 25.2
SusWrite 61
62% 86.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
150% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 58%
Great: 107%
Samsung HM320JI 320GB
298GB free
Firmware: 2SS0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 64 65 66 64 65 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
36.9% Below average
Read 65
Write 48.4
Mixed 39.2
SusWrite 63.7
40% 54.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
109% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TIMETEC-U8G-1333 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
51% Above average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 16.4
50% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 15.1
SC Mixed 15.6
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 73
55% 73 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 51%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 21.5" 1280 720 IVM5613 PLT2250MTS
Typical GA-H61MA-D2V Builds (Compare 431 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H61MA-D2V

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $430
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback