AMD Bilby

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics10.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAMD Bilby  (all builds)
MotherboardAMD Bilby
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230816
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 02 '23 at 08:25
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen Embedded R2514 Graphics
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
60.2% Good
Memory 61.3
1-Core 114
2-Core 215
70% 130 Pts
4-Core 318
8-Core 461
49% 389 Pts
64-Core 474
29% 474 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
AMD(1002 15D8) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 22.20.44
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
10.5% Very poor
Lighting 12.6
Reflection 12.5
Parallax 18
10% 14.4 fps
MRender 10.4
Gravity 15.9
Splatting 13.3
11% 13.2 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
64gb SATA Flash Drive 64GB
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SFMA003A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 82 83 88 85 76 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 26% Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston CBD26D4S9S1KC-4 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
52.1% Above average
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 17.8
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 20.1
SC Mixed 19.3
53% 18.6 GB/s
Latency 126
32% 126 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 27.2" 1280 720 GSM7707 LG HDR 4K
Typical Bilby Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: AMD Bilby

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback