Asus MAXIMUS VII IMPACT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics109% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive140% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VII IMPACT  (all builds)
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141016
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 02 '23 at 08:17
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Memory 91.7
1-Core 121
2-Core 231
84% 148 Pts
4-Core 416
8-Core 649
66% 532 Pts
64-Core 650
40% 650 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
Zotac(19DA 2435) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2050 MHz, MLim: 2052 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 537.34
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Lighting 144
Reflection 145
Parallax 134
117% 141 fps
MRender 97.2
Gravity 140
Splatting 122
99% 120 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 109%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 499GB
385GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 615 546 545 549 546 545 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
140% Outstanding
Read 919
Write 804
Mixed 495
SusWrite 558
155% 694 MB/s
4K Read 38.7
4K Write 69.9
4K Mixed 45.8
154% 51.5 MB/s
DQ Read 468
DQ Write 499
DQ Mixed 369
309% 445 MB/s
Poor: 99%
This bench: 140%
Great: 170%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
385GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 365 380 413 429 430 395 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 429
Write 423
Mixed 390
SusWrite 402
93% 411 MB/s
4K Read 38.1
4K Write 79.2
4K Mixed 50.8
165% 56 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 361
272% 363 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 109%
Great: 129%
Samsung MZVLQ512HALU-00000 512GB
264GB free
Firmware: FXV7101Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1118 1135 304 341 343 347 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
188% Outstanding
Read 1,412
Write 1,102
Mixed 1,245
SusWrite 598
244% 1,089 MB/s
4K Read 48.1
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 60.1
204% 69.9 MB/s
DQ Read 907
DQ Write 510
DQ Mixed 728
536% 715 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 188%
Great: 206%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
58.8% Above average
MC Read 20
MC Write 21.7
MC Mixed 18.1
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 21.5
SC Mixed 19.3
55% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 62.8
64% 62.8 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 29" 2560 1080 GSM59F1 LG ULTRAWIDE
Typical MAXIMUS VII IMPACT Builds (Compare 240 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VII IMPACT - $235

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $883
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback