Juana SF20GM7

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics1.68% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (94%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemJuana SF20GM7  (all builds)
MotherboardECS Mobile PC
Memory0.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210519
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 02 '23 at 07:27
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 94%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N4020
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 58.4
2-Core 93
36% 75.7 Pts
4-Core 88.1
8-Core 91.9
12% 90 Pts
64-Core 88.4
6% 88.4 Pts
Poor: 9% Great: 29%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Elitegroup(1019 9840) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.68% Terrible
Lighting 1.8
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 2
2% 1.83 fps
MRender 2.6
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 3
2% 2.5 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.68%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kimtigo 256GB 256GB
140GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0910A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 56 54 16 18 17 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
40.9% Average
Read 322
Write 250
Mixed 263
SusWrite 35.1
48% 217 MB/s
4K Read 13.4
4K Write 44.4
4K Mixed 13.7
61% 23.8 MB/s
DQ Read 171
DQ Write 166
DQ Mixed 37.4
64% 125 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 244%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown WAR4S2666D19041C 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
10.4% Very poor
MC Read 2.2
MC Write 6.3
MC Mixed 2.8
11% 3.77 GB/s
SC Read 1.6
SC Write 1.5
SC Mixed 1.8
5% 1.63 GB/s
Latency 259
15% 259 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 21%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 20 4 60 15.5" 1366 768 KDC05F1
Typical SF20GM7 Builds (Compare 44 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Juana SF20GM7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback