Intel SHARKBAY

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics50.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardIntel SHARKBAY  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20160720
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 02 '23 at 00:57
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570-$99
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
74% Very good
Memory 91.7
1-Core 87.3
2-Core 172
70% 117 Pts
4-Core 326
8-Core 328
44% 327 Pts
64-Core 338
21% 338 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 74%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 537.42
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.6% Above average
Lighting 62.2
Reflection 63.1
Parallax 59
51% 61.4 fps
MRender 64.5
Gravity 62.4
Splatting 58.8
50% 61.9 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 512GB
245GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 43 5.9 158 40 5.1 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
73.3% Very good
Read 451
Write 418
Mixed 372
SusWrite 69.9
73% 328 MB/s
4K Read 29.9
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 27.9
137% 54.3 MB/s
DQ Read 147
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 42.8
86% 169 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 102%
PNY 1TB SATA SSD 1TB
689GB free
Firmware: 215a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 366 384 438 431 418 437 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
98.7% Outstanding
Read 436
Write 460
Mixed 423
SusWrite 412
98% 433 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 97.7
4K Mixed 38.5
149% 56 MB/s
DQ Read 187
DQ Write 286
DQ Mixed 252
186% 242 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 98.7%
Great: 103%
WL1000GSA3272 1TB
687GB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 155 168 166 164 168 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
95.6% Outstanding
Read 171
Write 178
Mixed 88.7
SusWrite 162
110% 150 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 1.1
218% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 95.6%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown YXS1866C10D3/8G 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
60.9% Good
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 23.1
MC Mixed 19.6
60% 21.1 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 19.4
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 65.4
61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 59 60 36.1" 1280 720 TCL0000 43S421
Typical SHARKBAY Builds (Compare 301 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel SHARKBAY

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $142
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback