Lenovo 20HFCTO1WW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.64% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive93.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (93%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 20HFCTO1WW  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20HFCTO1WW
Memory14.5 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230815
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateOct 01 '23 at 19:30
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 93%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7300U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
50.9% Above average
Memory 63.9
1-Core 95.2
2-Core 170
62% 110 Pts
4-Core 218
8-Core 230
30% 224 Pts
64-Core 232
14% 232 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Legend(17AA 224B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9865
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
4.64% Terrible
Lighting 6.5
Reflection 5.2
Parallax 7.3
5% 6.33 fps
MRender 7.3
Gravity 6.6
Splatting 0.2
3% 4.7 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.64%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Pro 6000p NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$65
137GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 131P Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 244 277 213 177 108 94 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
93.8% Outstanding
Read 763
Write 525
Mixed 506
SusWrite 186
110% 495 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 71.5
4K Mixed 33.1
119% 43.3 MB/s
DQ Read 277
DQ Write 413
DQ Mixed 316
247% 335 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 93.8%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43BB1-CRC 029E CMSX16GX4M1A2666C18 24GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
54.9% Above average
MC Read 20.9
MC Write 21.7
MC Mixed 17.6
57% 20.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 14.4
41% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 50 60 13.9" 1280 720 LEN40A9
Typical 20HFCTO1WW Builds (Compare 23 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20HFCTO1WW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 19% - Very poor Total price: $65
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback