MSI MAG B650 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7D75)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 131%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 142%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics129% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive94.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D75
MotherboardMSI MAG B650 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7D75)  (all builds)
Memory24.4 GB free of 32 GB
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kolorów,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 01 '23 at 17:41
Run Duration230 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 18%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D-$330
AM5, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.4 GHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
100% Outstanding
Memory 79.1
1-Core 170
2-Core 354
105% 201 Pts
4-Core 647
8-Core 1,121
107% 884 Pts
64-Core 2,013
125% 2,013 Pts
Poor: 109%
This bench: 100%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$391
Nvidia(10DE 1E87) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 537.42
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
129% Outstanding
Lighting 174
Reflection 174
Parallax 177
142% 175 fps
MRender 188
Gravity 152
Splatting 128
125% 156 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 129%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 500GB
401GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 367 287 285 280 289 285 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
94.9% Outstanding
Read 422
Write 400
Mixed 321
SusWrite 299
81% 361 MB/s
4K Read 30.3
4K Write 78
4K Mixed 41.1
140% 49.8 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 350
DQ Mixed 345
265% 360 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 94.9%
Great: 123%
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$145
2TB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 286 301 313 287 311 316 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
71.6% Very good
Read 285
Write 285
Mixed 266
SusWrite 302
64% 285 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 60
4K Mixed 30.6
103% 37.2 MB/s
DQ Read 247
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 220
164% 220 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 128%
Samsung 870 EVO 2TB-$190
1.5TB free
Firmware: SVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 375 396 414 379 414 419 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 454
Write 425
Mixed 404
SusWrite 400
95% 421 MB/s
4K Read 32.8
4K Write 77.4
4K Mixed 43.3
146% 51.2 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 367
275% 366 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 104%
Great: 136%
Spcc M.2 PCIe SSD 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: ECFM12.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1141 934 938 928 940 939 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
211% Outstanding
Read 1,243
Write 1,858
Mixed 1,185
SusWrite 970
297% 1,314 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 90.4
4K Mixed 39.6
135% 51.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,625
DQ Write 1,107
DQ Mixed 1,392
1,032% 1,375 MB/s
Poor: 156%
This bench: 211%
Great: 578%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown LD5EU016G-6400LA 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
212% Outstanding
MC Read 110
MC Write 61.3
MC Mixed 73
232% 81.3 GB/s
SC Read 42.6
SC Write 61.4
SC Mixed 49.6
146% 51.2 GB/s
Latency 74
54% 74 ns
Poor: 140%
This bench: 212%
Great: 214%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 2 70 58 60 31.5" 1280 720 GBT3200 G32QC
Typical MAG B650 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7D75) Builds (Compare 663 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 271%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 275%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG B650 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7D75)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $1,247
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback