Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506LH_FX506LH

Performance Results


Gaming 31% Sail boat	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	36.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	118% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 months ago, 7 months ago.

System	Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506LH_FX506LH (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX506LH
Memory	9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20211126
Uptime	17.5 Days
Run Date	Oct 01 '23 at 17:17
Run Duration	116 Seconds
Run User	NOR-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-10300H 82,821 User benchmarks, average bench 74% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	70.3% Very good	Memory 66.4 1-Core 126 2-Core 242 78% 145 Pts	4-Core 402 8-Core 558 60% 480 Pts	64-Core 571 35% 571 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 70.3% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 34,471 User benchmarks, average bench 40% Asus(1043 177F) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1785 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.40 Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	36.4% Below average	Lighting 44.4 Reflection 50.1 Parallax 42.9 36% 45.8 fps	MRender 55.4 Gravity 41.5 Splatting 40.2 37% 45.7 fps
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 36.4% Great: 43%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Micron_2210_MTFDHBA512QFD 512GB 33,645 User benchmarks, average bench 176% 271GB free (System drive) Firmware: P6MA001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 601 61 63 65 66 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	118% Outstanding	Read 1,426 Write 929 Mixed 860 SusWrite 153 186% 842 MB/s	4K Read 34.7 4K Write 34.9 4K Mixed 37.5 119% 35.7 MB/s	DQ Read 599 DQ Write 57.4 DQ Mixed 89.9 126% 249 MB/s
Poor: 102% ↑ This bench: 118% Great: 247%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905711-039.A00G 2x8GB 31 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	62.6% Good	MC Read 26.2 MC Write 22.9 MC Mixed 19.2 65% 22.8 GB/s	SC Read 13.9 SC Write 20 SC Mixed 14.3 46% 16.1 GB/s	Latency 82.6 48% 82.6 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 62.6% Great: 82%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	68	57	144	27"	1280 720	MSI3FA6 MSI MAG271C

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506LH_FX506LH Builds (Compare 5,210 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506LH_FX506LH

CPU
Core i5-10300HIntelBench 74%, 82,821 samples	4,839x
Core i7-10870HIntelBench 79%, 23,498 samples	287x
Core i7-10750HIntelBench 77%, 206,796 samples	81x

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples	3,153x
GeForce GTX 1650NvidiaBench 40%, 34,471 samples	2,055x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 3%, 2,203 samples	2x

SSD
Micron_2210_MTFDHBA512QFD 512GBBench 176%, 33,645 samples	4,146x
Micron_2210_MTFDHBA1T0QFD 1TBBench 219%, 6,851 samples	230x
PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G-1002 512GBWDCBench 188%, 12,375 samples	128x

RAM
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 1x8GBMicronBench 44%, 28,935 samples	1,555x
M471A1K43DB1-CWE 1x8GBSamsungBench 45%, 34,565 samples	1,066x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 2x8GBMicronBench 85%, 42,443 samples	410x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16