HP 810-205ng

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.24% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	75.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	18GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 18GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP 810-205ng (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 2AF3
Memory	13.8 GB free of 18 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140529
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 01 '23 at 12:49
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	21%

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4790-$135 255,027 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	68% Good	Memory 72.1 1-Core 103 2-Core 204 71% 127 Pts	4-Core 344 8-Core 547 55% 446 Pts	64-Core 543 34% 543 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 68% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15 230,189 User benchmarks, average bench 3% HP(103C 2AF3) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5058 Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	3.24% Terrible	Lighting 3.6 Reflection 2.5 Parallax 5.9 3% 4 fps	MRender 7.1 Gravity 2.3 Splatting 4.8 4% 4.73 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.24% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Fanxiang S101 1TB 2,599 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 524GB free (System drive) Firmware: V0609B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 420 28 5.1 129 411 256 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	75.9% Very good	Read 467 Write 401 Mixed 389 SusWrite 208 82% 366 MB/s	4K Read 26 4K Write 65 4K Mixed 27 108% 39.3 MB/s	DQ Read 198 DQ Write 322 DQ Mixed 47.8 96% 189 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 75.9% Great: 107%
WD 5000AAD External 500GB 282 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 307GB free, PID 1003 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 18 19 19 19 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	12.9% Very poor	Read 58 Write 20.4 Mixed 22.7 SusWrite 18.7 34% 30 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.8 34% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.9% Great: 21%
SAMSUNG HM321HI 320GB 92 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 146GB free, PID 047a Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	13.2% Very poor	Read 60.5 Write 17.5 Mixed 20.4 SusWrite 19 33% 29.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.8 32% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 13.2% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 0215 CM3X2G1600C7 18GB 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 8192, 4096, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	38.5% Below average	MC Read 13.8 MC Write 14.4 MC Mixed 11.6 38% 13.3 GB/s	SC Read 9.6 SC Write 13.4 SC Mixed 11.1 32% 11.4 GB/s	Latency 93 43% 93 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	70	59	60	24"	1280 720	BNQ78A6 BenQ GL2450H

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 810-205ng Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 61%

Destroyer

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 50%

Yacht

System: HP 810-205ng

CPU
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	2x

GPU
RX 5700AMD $275Bench 85%, 75,918 samples	1x
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	1x

SSD
860 QVO 1TBSamsung $109Bench 89%, 201,200 samples	1x
S101 1TBFanxiangBench 86%, 2,599 samples	1x

RAM
M378B1G73DB0-CK0 Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 12GBSamsungBench 42%, 185 samples	1x
KHX1600C9D3/4GX Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 0215 CM3X2G1600C7 18GBKingstonBench 39%, 1 sample	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $519

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $515	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16