MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)

Performance Results


Gaming 34% Sail boat	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	44.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	60.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Micro-Star MS-7C51
Motherboard	MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51) (all builds)
Memory	4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191108
Uptime	9.9 Days
Run Date	Oct 01 '23 at 06:32
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	PHL-User
Background CPU	54%

Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104 181,631 User benchmarks, average bench 60% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	69.2% Good	Memory 81 1-Core 94.9 2-Core 186 70% 121 Pts	4-Core 332 8-Core 339 45% 336 Pts	64-Core 342 21% 342 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 69.2% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Asus(1043 881B) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 537.42 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	44.1% Average	Lighting 55.2 Reflection 78.8 Parallax 51.7 45% 61.9 fps	MRender 64 Gravity 49.4 Splatting 44.9 42% 52.8 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 44.1% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
EKV100-240G 240GB 34 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 75GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0920A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 256 113 57 21 37 54 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	60.1% Good	Read 441 Write 376 Mixed 130 SusWrite 89.5 57% 259 MB/s	4K Read 27.5 4K Write 81.4 4K Mixed 7.2 94% 38.7 MB/s	DQ Read 164 DQ Write 330 DQ Mixed 1.6 71% 165 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 60.1% Great: 87%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 88GB free Firmware: CC46 SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 91 92 91 94 96 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	52.7% Above average	Read 90.3 Write 59.7 Mixed 57 SusWrite 93 55% 75 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 52.7% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 1x8GB 14,156 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	56.5% Above average	MC Read 22.2 MC Write 17.2 MC Mixed 18.3 55% 19.2 GB/s	SC Read 18.3 SC Write 20.1 SC Mixed 19 55% 19.1 GB/s	Latency 73.9 54% 73.9 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 56.5% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	38	6	60	21.5"	1920 1080	LEN65CC LI2215sD

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51) Builds (Compare 3,864 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 31%

Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	535x
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	479x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $84Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	389x

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	312x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	228x
GTX 1660Nvidia $200Bench 68%, 230,793 samples	223x

SSD
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	220x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	204x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	102x

RAM
TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 1x16GBUnknownBench 43%, 3,974 samples	127x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	97x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBUnknownBench 85%, 99,207 samples	85x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $305

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16