Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FJ_X512FJ

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.42% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FJ_X512FJ  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X512FJ
Memory4.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210201
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateOct 01 '23 at 00:04
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User CRI-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8565U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
35.4% Below average
Memory 53
1-Core 24.6
2-Core 89.8
33% 55.8 Pts
4-Core 117
8-Core 45
13% 81.2 Pts
64-Core 370
23% 370 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Asus(1043 1851) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1631
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
3.42% Terrible
Lighting 1.9
Reflection 7.2
Parallax 2.4
2% 3.83 fps
MRender 8
Gravity 3.7
Splatting 12.6
7% 8.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.42%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
816GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 04.01A04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 97 98 74 98 92 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
42.9% Average
Read 60.8
Write 69.3
Mixed 58.2
SusWrite 88
51% 69.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.6
169% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K44BM0-CRC Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
37.6% Below average
MC Read 16
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 12
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 8.6
25% 8.9 GB/s
Latency 249
16% 249 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 15.5" 1280 720 NCP0046
Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FJ_X512FJ Builds (Compare 217 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FJ_X512FJ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $60
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback