Asus N552VW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics17.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus N552VW  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK N552VW
Memory6.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151106
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateSep 30 '23 at 20:17
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
63.5% Good
Memory 68.8
1-Core 86.5
2-Core 175
62% 110 Pts
4-Core 314
8-Core 482
49% 398 Pts
64-Core 493
30% 493 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960M
Asus(1043 1D8D) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 24.21.13.9924
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
17.7% Very poor
Lighting 22
Reflection 17.9
Parallax 20.5
18% 20.1 fps
MRender 23.3
Gravity 21.9
Splatting 18.6
17% 21.3 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLF128HCHP-00004 128GB
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXT2301Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 47 44 49 46 52 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
39.4% Below average
Read 403
Write 52.1
Mixed 95.3
SusWrite 47
32% 149 MB/s
4K Read 14.4
4K Write 23.5
4K Mixed 14.4
53% 17.4 MB/s
DQ Read 167
DQ Write 19.9
DQ Mixed 39.1
42% 75.2 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 56%
Seagate ST2000LM003 HN-M201RAD 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 2BE10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 127 128 126 129 128 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
68.1% Good
Read 110
Write 89.8
Mixed 67.9
SusWrite 126
72% 98.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.7
190% 2 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 70%
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 16GB-$7
0GB free, PID 5591
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 137
Write 39.6
Mixed 6
55% 60.9 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 3.1
163% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5143DB0-CPB M471A1G43DB0-CPB 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37.9% Below average
MC Read 13.9
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 12.5
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 11.2
SC Mixed 11.3
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 22 2 60 15.5" 1280 720 LGD04D4
Typical N552VW Builds (Compare 797 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus N552VW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback