Lenovo 82UG

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics25.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 82UG  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220929
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateSep 30 '23 at 17:22
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
FP7, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
52.8% Above average
Memory 51.9
1-Core 80.1
2-Core 143
52% 91.7 Pts
4-Core 288
8-Core 474
47% 381 Pts
64-Core 830
51% 830 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Legend(17AA 3B28) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.44.28
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.5% Poor
Lighting 29.4
Reflection 46.6
Parallax 51.6
24% 42.5 fps
MRender 24.9
Gravity 32.5
Splatting 42.7
28% 33.4 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 25.5%
Great: 35%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SKHynix_HFS001TEJ9X115N 1TB
917GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51010A12
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,425
Write 2,088
Mixed 1,031
408% 1,848 MB/s
4K Read 43.7
4K Write 83.6
4K Mixed 51.5
176% 59.6 MB/s
DQ Read 625
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 534
381% 494 MB/s
Poor: 293% Great: 557%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MTC4C10163S1SC48BA1 MT60B1G16HC-48B:A 16GB
4800, 4800 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 41.6
MC Write 38.2
MC Mixed 39.3
113% 39.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 33.9
SC Mixed 28.1
75% 26.2 GB/s
Latency 153
26% 153 ns
Poor: 102%
This bench: 104%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 57 30 165 16" 1280 720 BOE0A9B
Typical 82UG Builds (Compare 37 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

System: Lenovo 82UG

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback