PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 19.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 52.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | OEM X79G (all builds) |
Memory | 13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20220825 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Sep 30 '23 at 14:01 |
Run Duration | 131 Seconds |
Run User | VNM-User |
Background CPU | 2% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
|
59.9%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 8627) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.23
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
19.3%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
139GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1219
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.4 24 13 17 32 9.5 MB/s
|
52.8%
Above average
|
|||
41.3%
Average
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hynix HMT42GR7BFR4C 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
|
30.5%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
23% | 11% | 123 | 216 | 60 | 144 | 0" | 1280 720 | MTI0000 MEITIANHAO |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon E5-2670 v2IntelBench 67%, 831 samples | 81x |
Xeon E5-2650 v2IntelBench 67%, 5,123 samples | 73x |
Xeon E5-2689 0IntelBench 71%, 6,987 samples | 28x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 41x |
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 32x |
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $195Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 17x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 94% - Outstanding | Total price: $130 |