Lenovo 81NB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.74% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive56.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemLenovo 81NB  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory15.5 GB free of 20 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220608
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 29 '23 at 21:13
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3200U
FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
48.3% Average
Memory 65.2
1-Core 77.8
2-Core 138
55% 93.8 Pts
4-Core 178
8-Core 212
25% 195 Pts
64-Core 214
13% 214 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 3 Graphics
Legend(17AA 3801) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 23.7.2
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
5.74% Terrible
Lighting 5.8
Reflection 8.8
Parallax 8.1
5% 7.57 fps
MRender 8.5
Gravity 6.4
Splatting 12.2
8% 9.03 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.74%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 120GB-$25
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900613
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 98 113 61 90 65 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Read 421
Write 344
Mixed 32.3
SusWrite 99.8
49% 224 MB/s
4K Read 10.7
4K Write 50.5
4K Mixed 27.2
78% 29.5 MB/s
DQ Read 148
DQ Write 226
DQ Mixed 174
135% 183 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 87%
Gigabyte GP-GSM2NE3128GNTD 128GB
69GB free
Firmware: EDFM00.7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 839 840 435 192 194 193 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
144% Outstanding
Read 778
Write 642
Mixed 796
SusWrite 449
150% 666 MB/s
4K Read 40.3
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 58.8
197% 71 MB/s
DQ Read 490
DQ Write 601
DQ Mixed 537
408% 543 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 144%
Great: 184%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD CB16GS2666.C8ET 20GB
2667, 2667 MHz
4096, 16384 MB
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
42.5% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 15.6
MC Mixed 13.6
43% 15.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 13.6
SC Mixed 13.5
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 145
28% 145 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 13.9" 1280 720 CMN14D6
Typical 81NB Builds (Compare 231 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81NB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback