Gigabyte GA-770TA-UD3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics15.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-770TA-UD3  (all builds)
Memory6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100513
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 29 '23 at 17:01
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 965-$144
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
50.5% Above average
Memory 73.6
1-Core 51.2
2-Core 102
48% 75.5 Pts
4-Core 159
8-Core 168
22% 164 Pts
64-Core 170
10% 170 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6870
XFX(1682 3108) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
15.4% Very poor
Lighting 21.5
Reflection 20.7
Parallax 19.2
18% 20.5 fps
MRender 14.3
Gravity 15.8
Splatting 11.8
11% 14 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vaseky V800/60G 64GB
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FW200807
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 248
Write 80.1
Mixed 174
37% 167 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 40.7
4K Mixed 12.8
80% 27.1 MB/s
DQ Read 55.6
DQ Write 147
DQ Mixed 18
38% 73.6 MB/s
Poor: 41% Great: 69%
WD WD1600AVBB-63SYA0 160GB
149GB free
Firmware: 00.07H00
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 69.2
Write 69.5
Mixed 41.1
44% 59.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
151% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
32.9% Below average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 7.4
MC Mixed 12.9
33% 11.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 10.3
23% 8.17 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 58 60 22" 1280 720 HWP2848 LA2205
Typical GA-770TA-UD3 Builds (Compare 56 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-770TA-UD3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $220
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback