Acer Predator PT315-51

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 32% Sail boat	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	43.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 months ago, 7 months ago.

System	Acer Predator PT315-51 (all builds)
Motherboard	CFL Auris_CFS
Memory	12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200309
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 29 '23 at 07:47
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	IND-User
Background CPU	41%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9300H 116,682 User benchmarks, average bench 65% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	67.4% Good	Memory 87.7 1-Core 90.2 2-Core 162 68% 113 Pts	4-Core 256 8-Core 402 41% 329 Pts	64-Core 387 24% 387 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 67.4% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile) 92,838 User benchmarks, average bench 41% Acer(1025 1400) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3742 Performing below potential (67^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	43.3% Average	Lighting 56.3 Reflection 61.7 Parallax 50.5 46% 56.2 fps	MRender 42.1 Gravity 49.1 Splatting 48.2 38% 46.5 fps
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 43.3% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HBHQ-00007 256GB 581 User benchmarks, average bench 183% 61GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXH7202Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,404 Write 2,000 Mixed 1,468 434% 1,957 MB/s	4K Read 47.8 4K Write 84.3 4K Mixed 60.2 194% 64.1 MB/s	DQ Read 559 DQ Write 398 DQ Mixed 418 329% 458 MB/s
Poor: 107% Great: 252%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB 145,911 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 799GB free Firmware: ACM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 112 111 115 117 117 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	54.5% Above average	Read 75.3 Write 124 Mixed 64.2 SusWrite 114 69% 94.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.5 111% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 54.5% Great: 95%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 Kingston KHX2666C15S4/8G 16GB 125 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 3200, 2667 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (37^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	70.7% Very good	MC Read 27.2 MC Write 26.9 MC Mixed 21.6 72% 25.2 GB/s	SC Read 14 SC Write 25.5 SC Mixed 20.6 57% 20 GB/s	Latency 69 58% 69 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 70.7% Great: 81%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	70	58	144	15.5"	1280 720	LGD061E

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Predator PT315-51 Builds (Compare 349 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 70%

Battleship

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator PT315-51

CPU
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples	145x
Core i5-9300HIntelBench 68%, 23,588 samples	127x
Core i5-9300HIntelBench 65%, 116,682 samples	77x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	176x
GTX 1650 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 41%, 92,838 samples	130x
RTX 2060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 71%, 119,687 samples	43x

SSD
PC SN720 SDAPNTW-256G-1014 256GBWDCBench 169%, 1,060 samples	45x
MZVLB512HBJQ-00007 512GBSamsungBench 212%, 2,112 samples	32x
MZVLB256HBHQ-00007 256GBSamsungBench 183%, 581 samples	26x

RAM
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 1x8GBMicronBench 44%, 28,935 samples	40x
ACR26D4S9S8ME-8 1x8GBKingstonBench 42%, 19,360 samples	35x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 2x8GBMicronBench 85%, 42,443 samples	19x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16