Lenovo 81HQ

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.14% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive119% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (78%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 81HQ  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory0.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190624
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateSep 29 '23 at 01:34
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 78%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
40.4% Average
Memory 62
1-Core 46.5
2-Core 84.3
41% 64.3 Pts
4-Core 109
8-Core 118
15% 114 Pts
64-Core 134
8% 134 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Legend(17AA 3976) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8729
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
5.14% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 3.3
Parallax 7
5% 5.4 fps
MRender 5.8
Gravity 5.7
Splatting 8.9
6% 6.8 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.14%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata LEGEND 700 512GB
435GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1226A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 628 518 748 571 621 539 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 1,184
Write 1,029
Mixed 740
SusWrite 604
199% 889 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 34.4
4K Mixed 13.7
72% 24.1 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 231
DQ Mixed 339
243% 316 MB/s
Poor: 109%
This bench: 119%
Great: 262%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
851GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 99 100 89 88 80 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
67.3% Good
Read 140
Write 98.2
Mixed 67.9
SusWrite 92.7
73% 99.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 6.1
4K Mixed 0.6
217% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC Kingston 9905711-007.A00G 8GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
40.2% Average
MC Read 11.9
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 15
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 9.3
24% 8.3 GB/s
Latency 89.8
45% 89.8 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 65 48 60 13.9" 1280 720 CMN14C3
Typical 81HQ Builds (Compare 181 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81HQ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback