Intel H55AD17

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.92% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive35.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardIntel H55AD17  (all builds)
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201118
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 28 '23 at 17:31
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 860-$320
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
64.2% Good
Memory 88.9
1-Core 69.8
2-Core 138
61% 98.8 Pts
4-Core 222
8-Core 274
32% 248 Pts
64-Core 269
17% 269 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 740
Nvidia(10DE 1099) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 902 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 474.14
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
6.92% Terrible
Lighting 7.6
Reflection 10.1
Parallax 10.3
6% 9.33 fps
MRender 11.9
Gravity 10.1
Splatting 9.1
8% 10.4 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.92%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
128GB 128GB
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0803A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 220 229 236 84 25 MB/s
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35.8% Below average
Read 261
Write 234
Mixed 61.4
SusWrite 152
40% 177 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 27.6
4K Mixed 0.4
52% 17.5 MB/s
DQ Read 83.7
DQ Write 13
DQ Mixed 25.5
24% 40.7 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 90%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$31
419GB free
Firmware: ES12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 93 95 97 97 96 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
58.3% Above average
Read 108
Write 106
Mixed 57.3
SusWrite 95.4
67% 91.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
0, 0 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
41.4% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 12.9
MC Mixed 13.2
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 12.2
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 68.4
58% 68.4 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 55 25 60 22" 1280 720 LEN0A0C L2250p Wide
Typical H55AD17 Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel H55AD17

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $320
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback