| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 14% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | 74.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Intel SandyBridge Platform |
| Motherboard | Intel To be filled by O.E.M. (all builds) |
| Memory | 29.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20121205 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 28 '23 at 09:07 |
| Run Duration | 118 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 26% |
PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E31225
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
|
63.4%
Good
|
64% 108 Pts
|
35% 269 Pts
|
18% 290 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GT 1030
MSI(1462 8C98) 2GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 537.42
|
14%
Very poor
|
14% 17.6 fps
|
14% 16.6 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$123
435GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 215 226 239 238 240 MB/s
|
74.8%
Very good
|
54% 240 MB/s
|
135% 44.9 MB/s
|
147% 195 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 9965525-026.A00LF 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
|
50.2%
Above average
|
50% 17.3 GB/s
|
43% 15 GB/s
|
54% 74.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
SkillBench Score 33: 0P 2R 4G 11B (High Scores)
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
| Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 33% | 25% | 67 | 344 | 258 | 60 | 23.8" | 1920 1080 | ACR0923 SA241Y |
Typical To be filled by O.E.M. Builds (Compare 569 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Intel To be filled by O.E.M.
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples | 109x |
| Core i3 540Intel $60Bench 46%, 24,563 samples | 43x |
| Core i3 530Intel $45Bench 46%, 16,724 samples | 38x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples | 95x |
| GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 55x |
| HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples | 49x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 55% - Above average | Total price: $98 |