Ricoh Interactive Whiteboard

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics8.51% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive89.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemRicoh Interactive Whiteboard  (all builds)
MotherboardType2 Type2 - Board Product Name1
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220217
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 28 '23 at 06:44
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User MKD-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8259U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
71.2% Very good
Memory 78.1
1-Core 99.4
2-Core 196
71% 125 Pts
4-Core 350
8-Core 487
53% 418 Pts
64-Core 484
30% 484 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
8.51% Terrible
Lighting 11.6
Reflection 10.2
Parallax 13.1
10% 11.6 fps
MRender 14.9
Gravity 12.8
Splatting 0.3
7% 9.33 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.51%
Great: 10%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Foresee S50AF512GB 512GB
410GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H190117H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 400 393 381 412 421 404 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
89.6% Excellent
Read 400
Write 377
Mixed 372
SusWrite 402
88% 388 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 47.7
4K Mixed 35.2
115% 37.4 MB/s
DQ Read 334
DQ Write 256
DQ Mixed 278
213% 290 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF2G64HZ-2G6E1 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43.7% Average
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 10.7
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 12.3
SC Mixed 9.9
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 85.2
47% 85.2 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 53 60 21.5" 1680 987 SAM03C2 SyncMaster
Typical Interactive Whiteboard Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Ricoh Interactive Whiteboard

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 35% - Below average Total price: $119
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback