HP Z220 CMT Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics42.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
8 months ago, 6 months ago.
SystemHP Z220 CMT Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1790
Memory14.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190610
Uptime14.9 Days
Run DateSep 27 '23 at 22:05
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User MAR-User
Background CPU 33%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1245 V2-$368
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
62.8% Good
Memory 74.4
1-Core 80.3
2-Core 161
61% 105 Pts
4-Core 277
8-Core 401
42% 339 Pts
64-Core 443
27% 443 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 537.34
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.1% Average
Lighting 52.1
Reflection 54.7
Parallax 49.8
42% 52.2 fps
MRender 60.7
Gravity 49
Splatting 44.6
41% 51.4 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNJ512GCSU 512GB
200GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JULA0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 285 177 323 271 331 314 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Read 373
Write 213
Mixed 391
SusWrite 284
71% 315 MB/s
4K Read 18.6
4K Write 47.1
4K Mixed 29.7
91% 31.8 MB/s
DQ Read 313
DQ Write 231
DQ Mixed 254
195% 266 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 107%
Crucial MX200 500GB-$90
346GB free
Firmware: MU05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 393 399 401 413 406 387 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Read 396
Write 416
Mixed 303
SusWrite 400
85% 379 MB/s
4K Read 21.3
4K Write 56
4K Mixed 29
99% 35.4 MB/s
DQ Read 255
DQ Write 264
DQ Mixed 156
146% 225 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GU6MFR8C-PB 3x8GB
3 of 4 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
35.7% Below average
MC Read 12.8
MC Write 11.9
MC Mixed 10.9
34% 11.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 12.3
SC Mixed 11.7
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 92.8
43% 92.8 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 45 26 60 7.2" 1280 720 SAM0902 SAMSUNG
Typical Z220 CMT Workstation Builds (Compare 1,310 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: HP Z220 CMT Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $384
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback