Dell XPS 8700

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics54.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive91.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
8 months ago, 7 months ago.
SystemDell XPS 8700  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0KWVT8
Memory10 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140416
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateSep 27 '23 at 15:07
Run Duration238 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 26%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Memory 90.8
1-Core 117
2-Core 221
82% 143 Pts
4-Core 381
8-Core 576
59% 479 Pts
64-Core 583
36% 583 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 457.51
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
54.1% Above average
Lighting 65.3
Reflection 75.3
Parallax 68
53% 69.5 fps
MRender 67
Gravity 70
Splatting 67.5
56% 68.2 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SA510 2.5 2TB
585GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 530309WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 328 371 392 394 395 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
Read 428
Write 341
Mixed 357
SusWrite 346
83% 368 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 60.3
4K Mixed 39
125% 42.7 MB/s
DQ Read 341
DQ Write 290
DQ Mixed 118
142% 249 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 123%
WD WD120EFAX-68UNTN0 12TB
1TB free
Firmware: 81.00A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 157 154 161 157 159 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
91.9% Outstanding
Read 162
Write 169
Mixed 93.5
SusWrite 157
107% 145 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 5.6
4K Mixed 1.3
302% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 111%
WD WD120EFAX-68UNTN0 12TB
2TB free
Firmware: 81.00A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 149 148 148 153 146 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
79.3% Very good
Read 127
Write 129
Mixed 76.8
SusWrite 148
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 5.4
4K Mixed 1.5
321% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 111%
WD WD120EFAX-68UNTN0 12TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 81.00A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 103 95 100 94 97 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
55.7% Above average
Read 97.2
Write 95.4
Mixed 58.6
SusWrite 95.5
64% 86.7 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 5.4
4K Mixed 0.9
242% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 111%
Sabrent Disk Device 6TB
531GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.6 1.7 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
12.1% Very poor
Read 38.6
Write 38.6
Mixed 30.4
SusWrite 1.8
35% 27.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
104% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 88%
Sabrent Disk Device 6TB
517GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.5 1.7 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Read 37.8
Write 38.2
Mixed 30.5
SusWrite 1.7
34% 27 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
94% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 88%
Sabrent Disk Device 6TB
521GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.5 1.7 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
11.7% Very poor
Read 37.8
Write 39.5
Mixed 31.1
SusWrite 1.7
35% 27.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
100% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 88%
Sabrent Disk Device 6TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 37 37 37 38 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
36.3% Below average
Read 159
Write 9.2
Mixed 36
SusWrite 36.5
59% 60.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
94% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 88%
Sabrent Disk Device 6TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 21 21 21 21 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Read 38
Write 38.9
Mixed 31.5
SusWrite 20.6
43% 32.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
104% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 88%
Sabrent Disk Device 6TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 21 21 21 21 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
17.3% Very poor
Read 49.9
Write 38
Mixed 31.5
SusWrite 20.6
44% 35 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
97% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot PSD38G16002 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
57.8% Above average
MC Read 21.3
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 16.4
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 22.2
SC Mixed 20.1
55% 19.2 GB/s
Latency 65.5
61% 65.5 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 63 52 60 27" 1280 720 SAM0D32 C27F390
Typical XPS 8700 Builds (Compare 5,110 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Dell XPS 8700

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $271
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback