Asus ROG MAXIMUS XIII EXTREME GLACIAL

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive369% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
8 months ago, 8 months ago.
MotherboardAsus ROG MAXIMUS XIII EXTREME GLACIAL  (all builds)
Memory78.8 GB free of 96 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221212
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateSep 27 '23 at 10:11
Run Duration272 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-11900K-$254
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
88.1% Excellent
Memory 70.7
1-Core 152
2-Core 295
92% 173 Pts
4-Core 565
8-Core 1,004
94% 785 Pts
64-Core 1,570
97% 1,570 Pts
Poor: 94%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,650
Gigabyte(1458 40C0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3135 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 536.67
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 521
Reflection 593
Parallax 770
424% 628 fps
Gravity 586
Splatting 315
380% 451 fps
Poor: 303% Great: 407%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial T700 M.2 4TB-$369
2.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: PACR5102 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1491 1661 1887 1987 1909 1961 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
369% Outstanding
Read 3,852
Write 1,901
Mixed 1,855
SusWrite 1,816
522% 2,356 MB/s
4K Read 57.5
4K Write 51.8
4K Mixed 88.3
228% 65.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,286
DQ Write 53.1
DQ Mixed 106
219% 482 MB/s
Poor: 415%
This bench: 369%
Great: 994%
WDS200T1X0E-00AFY0 2TB
725GB free
Firmware: 613000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1122 1114 1135 1118 1095 923 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
251% Outstanding
Read 1,293
Write 1,182
Mixed 1,156
SusWrite 1,084
266% 1,179 MB/s
4K Read 48
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 65.6
226% 81.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,557
DQ Write 1284
DQ Mixed 1,369
1,039% 1,404 MB/s
Poor: 280%
This bench: 251%
Great: 578%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$198
768GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1907 1883 1341 1120 1118 1116 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
296% Outstanding
Read 2,208
Write 1,992
Mixed 1,480
SusWrite 1,414
398% 1,774 MB/s
4K Read 42.5
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 64
211% 75.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,367
DQ Write 1,164
DQ Mixed 1264
948% 1265 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 296%
Great: 371%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-4000C18-32GTZR 3x31.7GB
3 of 4 slots used
95GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
52.9% Above average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 20.2
MC Mixed 17.4
54% 18.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 17.5
SC Mixed 15.8
45% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 96.7
41% 96.7 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 120 48.8" 5120 1417 SAM7053 LC49G95T
Typical ROG MAXIMUS XIII EXTREME GLACIAL Builds (Compare 88 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 213%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 215%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG MAXIMUS XIII EXTREME GLACIAL

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $1,554
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback