Asus Rampage III Extreme

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics18.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive18.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Rampage III Extreme  (all builds)
Memory10 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111003
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 25 '17 at 15:49
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 X 980-$148
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
85.7% Excellent
Memory 97.4
1-Core 103
2-Core 209
80% 137 Pts
4-Core 399
8-Core 673
65% 536 Pts
64-Core 799
50% 799 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.71
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
18.6% Very poor
Lighting 0.03
Reflection 142
Parallax 28.4
0% 56.8 fps
MRender 98.2
Gravity 20.9
Splatting 79.3
55% 66.1 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow SNV Series 128GB
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: C091126a Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
18.2% Very poor
Read 207
Write 53.3
Mixed 35.7
21% 98.8 MB/s
4K Read 10.4
4K Write 8.59
4K Mixed 1.92
23% 6.96 MB/s
DQ Read 5.32
DQ Write 10
DQ Mixed 4.26
4% 6.54 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 30%
Hitachi HUA722020ALA330 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: JKAOA3EA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
67.9% Good
Read 118
Write 119
Mixed 91.6
82% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.79
4K Write 1.45
4K Mixed 0.46
110% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x2GB
6 of 6 slots used
12GB DIMM
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
60.6% Good
MC Read 22.4
MC Write 19.8
MC Mixed 21.9
61% 21.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 10.7
SC Mixed 14.9
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 48.7
82% 48.7 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Rampage III Extreme Builds (Compare 751 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus Rampage III Extreme

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $419
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback