Lenovo 90JX003UUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics90.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive37.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 90JX003UUS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 36E7
Memory23.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180908
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 27 '23 at 06:58
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$186
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
Memory 90.8
1-Core 130
2-Core 256
89% 159 Pts
4-Core 494
8-Core 800
79% 647 Pts
64-Core 962
60% 962 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$271
Gigabyte(1458 3FC1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 537.42
Performing below potential (53rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
90.1% Outstanding
Lighting 113
Reflection 106
Parallax 108
92% 109 fps
MRender 133
Gravity 98.5
Splatting 91.5
86% 108 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFM128GDHTNG-8310B 128GB
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80060C00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 158 166 164 165 166 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37.3% Below average
Read 179
Write 96.3
Mixed 189
SusWrite 161
35% 156 MB/s
4K Read 5.8
4K Write 14.6
4K Mixed 16.8
38% 12.4 MB/s
DQ Read 194
DQ Write 149
DQ Mixed 169
127% 170 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$48
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 211 211 211 212 211 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 53% Great: 106%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
851GB free
Firmware: CC63
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 191 190 191 193 195 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 195
Write 162
Mixed 83.4
SusWrite 191
115% 158 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 111%
Great: 112%
WD easystore 264D 14TB
10.5TB free, PID 264d
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 203 200 191 188 202 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
83.7% Excellent
Read 146
Write 150
Mixed 150
SusWrite 197
224% 161 MB/s
4K Read 8.8
4K Write 5.7
4K Mixed 2.1
298% 5.53 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4DFRA32A.C8FE 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
76.7% Very good
MC Read 29.5
MC Write 28.6
MC Mixed 22.8
77% 27 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 30
SC Mixed 24.2
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 64.9
62% 64.9 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 41: 0P 5R 5G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
41% 14% 78 216 58 60 27.5" 1280 720 SAM0C4C U28E590
Typical 90JX003UUS Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: Lenovo 90JX003UUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $245
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback