Gigabyte GA-B550 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 101%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics120% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B550 AORUS MASTER  (all builds)
Memory24.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210423
Uptime2.4 Days
Run DateSep 27 '23 at 02:17
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
94.8% Outstanding
Memory 79.6
1-Core 165
2-Core 318
100% 188 Pts
4-Core 590
8-Core 871
91% 731 Pts
64-Core 1,067
66% 1,067 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 94.8%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
Nvidia(10DE 12B0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 537.42
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
120% Outstanding
Lighting 157
Reflection 163
Parallax 156
128% 159 fps
MRender 181
Gravity 141
Splatting 122
118% 148 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 120%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 520 Series 120GB-$199
7GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 400i
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 385
Write 163
Mixed 201
55% 250 MB/s
4K Read 32.7
4K Write 83.3
4K Mixed 36.9
141% 51 MB/s
DQ Read 182
DQ Write 150
DQ Mixed 169
126% 167 MB/s
Poor: 57% Great: 88%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
706GB free
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 428 453 441 489 491 490 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 501
Write 476
Mixed 402
SusWrite 465
104% 461 MB/s
4K Read 34.3
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 46.7
166% 61.1 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 360
DQ Mixed 368
277% 369 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 116%
Great: 121%
Samsung 870 QVO 4TB-$306
3TB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 429 453 441 490 491 490 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 477
Mixed 438
SusWrite 466
106% 472 MB/s
4K Read 36.9
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 49.9
176% 64.4 MB/s
DQ Read 390
DQ Write 364
DQ Mixed 372
281% 375 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 120%
Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SP016GXLZU320BSB 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
51.7% Above average
MC Read 18.8
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 16.8
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 18.2
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 81.5
49% 81.5 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 34" 1280 720 MSI3DA0 MSI MPG341CQR
Typical GA-B550 AORUS MASTER Builds (Compare 1,197 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 147%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 146%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B550 AORUS MASTER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $794
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback