Toshiba Satellite C650D

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 17% Surfboard	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 14.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	22.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (68%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago.

System	Toshiba Satellite C650D (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA Portable PC
Memory	5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110407
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 26 '23 at 23:01
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	68%

PC Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E-350 6,654 User benchmarks, average bench 25% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	14.7% Very poor	Memory 25.7 1-Core 15.9 2-Core 19.6 14% 20.4 Pts	4-Core 22.3 8-Core 22.7 3% 22.5 Pts	64-Core 22.2 1% 22.2 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 14.7% Great: 36%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6310 13,166 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Toshiba(1179 FDE8) 384MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.0 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	0.82% Terrible	Lighting 0.9 Reflection 1.5 Parallax 1.4 1% 1.27 fps	MRender 1.9 Gravity 0.4 Splatting 1.3 1% 1.2 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.82% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Fanxiang S101 256GB 810 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 186GB free (System drive) Firmware: W0220A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 136 164 172 169 147 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	22.3% Poor	Read 119 Write 129 Mixed 119 SusWrite 158 30% 131 MB/s	4K Read 5.1 4K Write 8.2 4K Mixed 5.1 19% 6.13 MB/s	DQ Read 53.9 DQ Write 47.8 DQ Mixed 30 28% 43.9 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 22.3% Great: 98%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown RMT3160ED58E9W1600 Nanya NT4GC64B8HG0NS-CG 8GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 1066, 1066 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	8.17% Terrible	MC Read 2.6 MC Write 2.6 MC Mixed 2.9 8% 2.7 GB/s	SC Read 1.9 SC Write 1.7 SC Mixed 2.9 6% 2.17 GB/s	Latency 284 14% 284 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 8.17% Great: 49%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	53	32	60	15.5"	1280 720	SEC5541

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Satellite C650D Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 34%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite C650D

CPU
Athlon II P320AMD $20Bench 34%, 3,972 samples	7x
V120AMDBench 33%, 586 samples	5x
E-350AMDBench 25%, 6,654 samples	3x

GPU
Mobility Radeon HD 4250ATIBench 1%, 11,054 samples	16x
Radeon HD 6310AMDBench 1%, 13,166 samples	4x
Radeon HD 6250AMDBench 1%, 1,583 samples	2x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	2x
LCS-128M6S 2.5 128GBLiteonitBench 78%, 3,907 samples	1x
Solid State Disk 120GBSpccBench 59%, 22,489 samples	1x

RAM
8JSF25664HZ-1G4D1 2x2GBMicronBench 34%, 1,373 samples	2x
M471B5673FH0-CF8 2x2GBSamsungBench 25%, 6,000 samples	2x
M471B2873FHS-CF8 M471B5673FH0-CF8 3GBSamsungBench 21%, 101 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 42% - Average

Total price: $48

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16