HP 250 G7 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.09% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive58.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (58%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 250 G7 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 84A7
Memory3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221116
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateSep 26 '23 at 12:05
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 58%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7020U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
52.3% Above average
Memory 79.4
1-Core 60.6
2-Core 108
52% 82.7 Pts
4-Core 148
8-Core 155
20% 152 Pts
64-Core 155
10% 155 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia MX110
HP(103C 84A7) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3203
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
6.09% Terrible
Lighting 6.7
Reflection 9.5
Parallax 7.4
6% 7.87 fps
MRender 11.5
Gravity 8
Splatting 7.9
7% 9.13 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.09%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Fast DATA 240G 240GB
162GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS1104C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 300 250 262 288 89 21 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
58.3% Above average
Read 410
Write 392
Mixed 296
SusWrite 202
73% 325 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 44
4K Mixed 10.8
74% 26.4 MB/s
DQ Read 134
DQ Write 239
DQ Mixed 16.1
60% 130 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.2% Below average
MC Read 12.6
MC Write 11.7
MC Mixed 9.9
33% 11.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 10.8
SC Mixed 10.9
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 84.9
47% 84.9 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 46 13 60 15.5" 1280 720 CMN15DB
Typical 250 G7 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 2,862 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP 250 G7 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback