Asus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 157% UFO	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 155% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	190% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	53.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210615
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 26 '23 at 11:12
Run Duration	162 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	20%

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$158 128,080 User benchmarks, average bench 98% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	84% Excellent	Memory 80.6 1-Core 152 2-Core 295 95% 176 Pts	4-Core 469 8-Core 808 77% 638 Pts	64-Core 1,291 80% 1,291 Pts
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 84% Great: 112%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 7800-XT 3,615 User benchmarks, average bench 180% AMD(1002 0E37) ≥ 4GB Ram: 16GB, Driver: 23.9.2 Performing below potential (55^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	190% Outstanding	Lighting 246 Reflection 240 Parallax 473 200% 320 fps	MRender 320 Gravity 295 Splatting 265 237% 293 fps
Poor: 130% ↑ This bench: 190% Great: 202%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$76 455,997 User benchmarks, average bench 310% 24GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,364 Write 2,296 Mixed 1,782 479% 2,147 MB/s	4K Read 58.2 4K Write 148 4K Mixed 82.5 272% 96.1 MB/s	DQ Read 1,113 DQ Write 947 DQ Mixed 1,046 779% 1,035 MB/s
Poor: 188% Great: 410%
JAJM300M240C 240GB 111 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 33GB free Firmware: S0222A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 397 167 33 89 44 44 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	65.1% Good	Read 475 Write 395 Mixed 360 SusWrite 129 76% 340 MB/s	4K Read 22.4 4K Write 85.9 4K Mixed 19.9 105% 42.7 MB/s	DQ Read 136 DQ Write 189 DQ Mixed 28.8 59% 118 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 65.1% Great: 116%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16ATF4G64AZ-3G2B1 2x31.5GB 77 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 2 of 4 slots used 63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	81.3% Excellent	MC Read 33.1 MC Write 22.2 MC Mixed 31.3 82% 28.9 GB/s	SC Read 24.7 SC Write 23.3 SC Mixed 32.1 76% 26.7 GB/s	Latency 84.4 47% 84.4 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 81.3% Great: 111%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	71	59	240	27"	1280 720	AOC2702 27G2G8

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING Builds (Compare 4,596 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 184%

UFO

Desktop 104%

UFO

Workstation 201%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $260Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	1,033x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $158Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	745x
Ryzen 9 3900XAMD $395Bench 88%, 197,342 samples	564x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	561x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	370x
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	342x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	418x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $76Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	354x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	227x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	219x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GBCorsair $95Bench 95%, 56,114 samples	128x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $55Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	111x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $1,277

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $95	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16