PC ROG STRIX X299-E GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 166%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 165%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics214% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemPC ROG STRIX X299-E GAMING  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK ROG STRIX X299-E GAMING
Memory26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230824
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 26 '23 at 03:15
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7820X-$375
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Memory 77
1-Core 129
2-Core 240
82% 149 Pts
4-Core 470
8-Core 824
78% 647 Pts
64-Core 1,255
78% 1,255 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198
Gigabyte(1458 4043) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 537.42
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
214% Outstanding
Lighting 316
Reflection 307
Parallax 362
258% 328 fps
MRender 359
Gravity 257
Splatting 193
212% 270 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 214%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,564
Write 2,019
Mixed 1,445
445% 2,009 MB/s
4K Read 60.8
4K Write 206
4K Mixed 87.3
313% 118 MB/s
DQ Read 1199
DQ Write 761
DQ Mixed 1,014
747% 991 MB/s
Poor: 195% Great: 393%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
393GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 58 59 57 58 57 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
53.8% Above average
Read 130
Write 69.8
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 57.4
59% 80.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 88%
Seagate ST8000VN004-2M2101 8TB
7.5TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 162 163 163 165 163 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 18% Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$47
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 175 177 184 185 188 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Read 106
Write 92.3
Mixed 74.6
SusWrite 182
83% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0
78% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH16GX4M2E3200C16 CMK16GX4M2D3000C16 CM4X8GD3000C15K4 CMH16GX4M2E3200C16 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
54.3% Above average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 17.1
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 19.6
SC Mixed 10.9
40% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 86.8
46% 86.8 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 31.5" 1280 720 SAM0E3A U32H85x
Typical ROG STRIX X299-E GAMING Builds (Compare 80 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine

System: PC ROG STRIX X299-E GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $772
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback