Asus TUF GAMING B660M-PLUS WIFI D4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 238%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 265%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 119%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics209% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive347% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B660M-PLUS WIFI D4  (all builds)
Memory27.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220812
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateSep 26 '23 at 02:46
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 47%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-13600KF-$235
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
119% Outstanding
Memory 78.9
1-Core 212
2-Core 426
123% 239 Pts
4-Core 855
8-Core 1,473
141% 1,164 Pts
64-Core 2,482
154% 2,482 Pts
Poor: 117%
This bench: 119%
Great: 127%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$660
Nvidia(10DE 1535) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 537.34
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
209% Outstanding
Lighting 306
Reflection 283
Parallax 349
249% 313 fps
MRender 351
Gravity 263
Splatting 189
210% 268 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 209%
Great: 225%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Fanxiang S660 500GB
381GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN08661
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2420 2383 2391 796 593 565 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
347% Outstanding
Read 2,755
Write 1,664
Mixed 1,436
SusWrite 1,525
411% 1,845 MB/s
4K Read 47.2
4K Write 178
4K Mixed 68
253% 97.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,425
DQ Write 1,539
DQ Mixed 1,431
1,091% 1,465 MB/s
Poor: 176%
This bench: 347%
Great: 406%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$49
760GB free
Firmware: CC54
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 125 125 124 125 126 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
63.9% Good
Read 97.8
Write 84.5
Mixed 61.8
SusWrite 125
68% 92.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 96%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 161 159 159 158 166 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
60.4% Good
Read 48.8
Write 85.2
Mixed 59.9
SusWrite 160
65% 88.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 7.4
4K Mixed 0.6
233% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 87%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
6TB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 173 167 172 173 173 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
79.8% Very good
Read 105
Write 112
Mixed 81
SusWrite 172
86% 117 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 0.6
214% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A4G43MB1-CTD 1x31GB
1 of 4 slots used
31GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
46.5% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 12.7
45% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 17.5
SC Mixed 14.6
45% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 80.4
50% 80.4 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 55 60 34" 1280 720 SAM0F70 S34J55x
Typical TUF GAMING B660M-PLUS WIFI D4 Builds (Compare 3,941 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B660M-PLUS WIFI D4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $476
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback