PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 39.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Seneca PRO428739 (all builds) |
Motherboard | ASUSTeK H81M-A |
Memory | 11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20130827 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Sep 26 '23 at 00:27 |
Run Duration | 153 Seconds |
Run User | CAN-User |
Background CPU | 28% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-4440-$99
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
|
60.4%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD RX 580-2048SP
AMD(1002 0B31) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1284 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.3.1
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
39.1%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Seagate ST3320418AS 320GB-$54
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 44 40 58 47 51 MB/s
|
25.3%
Poor
|
|||
Samsung HD400LJ 400GB-$85
136GB free
Firmware: ZZ100-15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 21 20 21 21 MB/s
|
25.5%
Poor
|
|||
WD WD5000BUDT-63G8FY0 500GB
30GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 62 61 59 62 62 MB/s
|
36.9%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
48.4%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 59 | 33 | 60 | 36.1" | 1280 720 | SAN0000 FW50R79FC |
|
|
|
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 81% - Excellent | Total price: $99 |