HP h8-1131sc

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics8.22% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
8 months ago, 8 months ago.
SystemHP h8-1131sc  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2AB5
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111012
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateSep 25 '23 at 15:52
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$134
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
76.1% Very good
Memory 89
1-Core 95.4
2-Core 188
73% 124 Pts
4-Core 351
8-Core 444
51% 398 Pts
64-Core 447
28% 447 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112
Asus(1043 8439) 1GB
CLim: 1071 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 461.92
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
8.22% Terrible
Lighting 9.1
Reflection 11.8
Parallax 11.8
7% 10.9 fps
MRender 13.7
Gravity 12
Splatting 10.7
10% 12.1 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.22%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
383GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 462 452 446 438 358 368 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 486
Write 456
Mixed 428
SusWrite 421
101% 448 MB/s
4K Read 34.3
4K Write 73.6
4K Mixed 45.8
150% 51.2 MB/s
DQ Read 391
DQ Write 354
DQ Mixed 368
277% 371 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 108%
Great: 129%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. Hynix HMT351U6BFR8C-H9 BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. Hynix HMT351U6BFR8C-H9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
49.5% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 15.3
47% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 16.6
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 68.3
59% 68.3 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 24.1" 1280 720 HWP301F HP LA2405x
Typical h8-1131sc Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: HP h8-1131sc

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $413
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback