Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 97%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics127% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive222% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
8 months ago, 8 months ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory15.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200528
Uptime3.5 Days
Run DateSep 25 '23 at 07:36
Run Duration247 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$86
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
81% Excellent
Memory 68.3
1-Core 122
2-Core 242
78% 144 Pts
4-Core 503
8-Core 804
80% 653 Pts
64-Core 965
60% 965 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 81%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6700-XT-$480
Sapphire(1DA2 E445) ≥ 4GB; AMD RX 6700 XT
Ram: 12GB, Driver: 23.9.2
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
127% Outstanding
Lighting 143
Reflection 142
Parallax 304
117% 196 fps
MRender 246
Gravity 153
Splatting 213
167% 204 fps
Poor: 113%
This bench: 127%
Great: 129%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$59
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42B2S7JA Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 430 178 165 161 160 163 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
222% Outstanding
Read 2,303
Write 1,193
Mixed 1,227
SusWrite 209
272% 1,233 MB/s
4K Read 61.9
4K Write 145
4K Mixed 81.3
275% 96 MB/s
DQ Read 809
DQ Write 602
DQ Mixed 483
421% 632 MB/s
Poor: 139%
This bench: 222%
Great: 271%
Fanxiang S101 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: SN12574
SusWrite @10s intervals: 459 433 431 436 438 433 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 433
Write 481
Mixed 426
SusWrite 438
100% 444 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 81
4K Mixed 44.7
155% 53.9 MB/s
DQ Read 280
DQ Write 306
DQ Mixed 174
164% 253 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 105%
Great: 109%
CT500MX500SSD4 500GB
125GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 449 450 450 452 453 453 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 456
Mixed 432
SusWrite 451
104% 461 MB/s
4K Read 38.9
4K Write 86
4K Mixed 48.9
167% 57.9 MB/s
DQ Read 256
DQ Write 270
DQ Mixed 199
167% 242 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 111%
Great: 123%
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB
147GB free
Firmware: M6CR030
SusWrite @10s intervals: 456 449 449 241 51 47 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Read 506
Write 456
Mixed 412
SusWrite 282
93% 414 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 90.6
4K Mixed 24.9
127% 48.8 MB/s
DQ Read 173
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 37.8
92% 186 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 100%
StoreJet Transcend 500GB
80GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 39 39 39 39 39 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
20% Very poor
Read 55.2
Write 30.8
Mixed 31.7
SusWrite 38.4
50% 39 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
64% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 20%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 CMK16GX4M2E3200C16 CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 CMK16GX4M2E3200C16 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67.5% Good
MC Read 27.5
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 26.7
69% 24.1 GB/s
SC Read 21.4
SC Write 17.5
SC Mixed 26.8
63% 21.9 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 494 428 60 23.8" 1280 720 DELD0FE DELL P2421D
Typical TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 4,558 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $758
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback