PC GK7NR0R

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (5th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 95 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics38.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive143% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemPC GK7NR0R  (all builds)
MotherboardTongFang GK7NR0R
Memory4.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200901
Uptime6.4 Days
Run DateSep 24 '23 at 21:08
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU 59%

 PC Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
50% Above average
Memory 50.3
1-Core 98.8
2-Core 171
59% 107 Pts
4-Core 268
8-Core 415
42% 341 Pts
64-Core 612
38% 612 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 50%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060 (Mobile)
Device(1D05 1100) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3699
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
38.2% Below average
Lighting 51.9
Reflection 36.5
Parallax 37.5
42% 42 fps
MRender 39.3
Gravity 42.4
Splatting 31.8
30% 37.8 fps
Poor: 49%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 83%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
168GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 921 825 801 804 779 781 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
143% Outstanding
Read 1,240
Write 1,042
Mixed 837
SusWrite 819
221% 985 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 36.2
4K Mixed 26
82% 27.2 MB/s
DQ Read 518
DQ Write 287
DQ Mixed 390
293% 398 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 143%
Great: 355%
CT1000P3PSSD8 1TB
822GB free
Firmware: P9CR40A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1378 1206 1427 1199 1016 1011 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
150% Outstanding
Read 864
Write 1,002
Mixed 931
SusWrite 1,206
227% 1,001 MB/s
4K Read 17.2
4K Write 42.9
4K Mixed 22.7
78% 27.6 MB/s
DQ Read 517
DQ Write 283
DQ Mixed 445
319% 415 MB/s
Poor: 115%
This bench: 150%
Great: 441%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM4X8GF2666C18S2 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
55.2% Above average
MC Read 24.2
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 21.5
62% 21.9 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 9.2
SC Mixed 9.8
25% 8.77 GB/s
Latency 173
23% 173 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 54 60 21.7" 1280 720 BOE0823
Typical GK7NR0R Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Gunboat

System: PC GK7NR0R

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $70
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback