Apple iMac12,1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics9.01% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive33.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemApple iMac12,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-942B5BF58194151B
Memory21.5 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190614
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 24 '23 at 19:50
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600S-$235
U2E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
66.2% Good
Memory 87.4
1-Core 84.2
2-Core 162
67% 111 Pts
4-Core 248
8-Core 342
37% 295 Pts
64-Core 349
22% 349 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2100M
Dell(1028 15CC) 2GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 426.78
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
9.01% Terrible
Lighting 10.2
Reflection 15.1
Parallax 12.7
8% 12.7 fps
MRender 13.9
Gravity 13.7
Splatting 11.1
10% 12.9 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 9.01%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
173GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF8704RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 235 108 119 130 125 128 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
33.2% Below average
Read 357
Write 304
Mixed 214
SusWrite 141
57% 254 MB/s
4K Read 6.7
4K Write 15.8
4K Mixed 8.7
30% 10.4 MB/s
DQ Read 13.6
DQ Write 35.1
DQ Mixed 18
16% 22.2 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 56%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$100
171GB free
Firmware: SVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 375 427 405 445 450 450 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
98.5% Outstanding
Read 477
Write 455
Mixed 440
SusWrite 425
101% 449 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 76
4K Mixed 40.6
133% 47.8 MB/s
DQ Read 288
DQ Write 249
DQ Mixed 272
203% 270 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 98.5%
Great: 137%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 24GB
null MHz
4096, 4096, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
48.1% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 15.3
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 15.1
SC Mixed 14.9
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 73.1
55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 48 11 60 21.5" 1920 1080 APPA00C iMac
Typical iMac12,1 Builds (Compare 104 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Apple iMac12,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $98
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback