Asus PRIME A520M-K

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive272% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A520M-K  (all builds)
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210201
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 24 '23 at 15:00
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
94.6% Outstanding
Memory 72.4
1-Core 171
2-Core 341
101% 195 Pts
4-Core 626
8-Core 988
99% 807 Pts
64-Core 1,141
71% 1,141 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 94.6%
Great: 107%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kxg60znv512g KIOXIA 512GB
97GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AGHA4101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1391 821 826 818 816 825 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
272% Outstanding
Read 2,119
Write 2,394
Mixed 1,599
SusWrite 916
394% 1,757 MB/s
4K Read 48.3
4K Write 164
4K Mixed 70.9
251% 94.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,293
DQ Write 1,148
DQ Mixed 911
768% 1,117 MB/s
Poor: 121%
This bench: 272%
Great: 247%
Adata SU630 240GB
223GB free
Firmware: R1210A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 216 34 45 23 37 6.1 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
63.2% Good
Read 380
Write 345
Mixed 306
SusWrite 60
61% 273 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 89.4
4K Mixed 26.8
122% 47.6 MB/s
DQ Read 91.1
DQ Write 256
DQ Mixed 0.4
50% 116 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D30AESBK.M8FE Corsair CMK8GX4M1D3000C16 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66.5% Good
MC Read 29.2
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 25.1
67% 23.4 GB/s
SC Read 22.1
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 25.9
60% 21.1 GB/s
Latency 82.5
48% 82.5 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 0" 1280 720
Typical PRIME A520M-K Builds (Compare 1,497 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A520M-K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $143
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback