Asus M51AC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	8.19% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

8 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago.

System	Asus M51AC (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK M51AC
Memory	9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130927
Uptime	8.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 24 '23 at 11:15
Run Duration	182 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4570-$99 129,272 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	65.2% Good	Memory 85.8 1-Core 92.9 2-Core 177 70% 119 Pts	4-Core 261 8-Core 258 35% 260 Pts	64-Core 259 16% 259 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 65.2% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112 69,673 User benchmarks, average bench 8% Asus(1043 8431) 1GB CLim: 1058 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	8.19% Terrible	Lighting 9.1 Reflection 11.7 Parallax 11.8 7% 10.9 fps	MRender 13.7 Gravity 11.8 Splatting 10.6 10% 12 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 8.19% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TB 74,123 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 572GB free (System drive) Firmware: 415000WD Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 454 Write 421 Mixed 299 87% 391 MB/s	4K Read 35 4K Write 63.3 4K Mixed 42.7 141% 47 MB/s	DQ Read 38.8 DQ Write 112 DQ Mixed 183 109% 111 MB/s
Poor: 65% Great: 117%
WD Blue 1TB (2015)-$30 52,322 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 111GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 124 122 125 126 124 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	76.7% Very good	Read 143 Write 131 Mixed 75.7 SusWrite 124 87% 118 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1 211% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 76.7% Great: 87%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 4GB 996 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 2GB free, PID 1603 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 15.2 Write 3.5 Mixed 5.2 8% 7.97 MB/s	4K Read 4.3 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.1 23% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 1315 CT102464BD160B.M16 16GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	59.2% Above average	MC Read 21 MC Write 22.7 MC Mixed 18.2 59% 20.6 GB/s	SC Read 16.6 SC Write 18.3 SC Mixed 18.3 51% 17.7 GB/s	Latency 71.1 56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 59.2% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	71	59	60	21.7"	1280 720	HWP302E HP 22xi

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M51AC Builds (Compare 633 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Raft

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

System: Asus M51AC

CPU
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	390x
Core i7-4770SIntel $112Bench 71%, 13,157 samples	125x
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	33x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	43x
GeForce GT 640NvidiaBench 6%, 34,519 samples	41x
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples	36x

SSD
MX500 1TBCrucial $88Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	15x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	15x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	14x

RAM
MI64C1D1629Z1 2x8GBAdataBench 54%, 2,816 samples	79x
MI64C1D1629Z1 1x8GBAdataBench 31%, 1,606 samples	36x
AO2L16BC8R2-BR2S 2x8GBUnknownBench 56%, 671 samples	36x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 82% - Excellent

Total price: $222

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $95	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16