Fujitsu PRIMERGY TX100 S3P

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (80%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemFujitsu PRIMERGY TX100 S3P  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3009-B1
Memory13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121218
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 24 '23 at 08:41
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 80%

 PC Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1220 V2-$305
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
21.3% Poor
Memory 14.8
1-Core 35.1
2-Core 69.2
21% 39.7 Pts
4-Core 162
8-Core 145
21% 154 Pts
64-Core 147
9% 147 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 21.3%
Great: 77%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23
419GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 39 32 24 25 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
24.2% Poor
Read 54.6
Write 35.6
Mixed 31.1
SusWrite 29.5
28% 37.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.2
62% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 24.2%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 18KSF1G72AZ-1G4E1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Relative performance (0th percentile)
24.7% Poor
MC Read 9.5
MC Write 11
MC Mixed 8.5
28% 9.67 GB/s
SC Read 2.9
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 5.2
13% 4.67 GB/s
Latency 436
9% 436 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 24.7%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 17 13 64 0" 1280 720
Typical PRIMERGY TX100 S3P Builds (Compare 29 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu PRIMERGY TX100 S3P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $355
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback