Asus PRIME X299-DELUXE

Performance Results


Gaming 86% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 97% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	201% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X299-DELUXE (all builds)
Memory	113.6 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170731
Uptime	34 Days
Run Date	Dec 25 '17 at 03:41
Run Duration	204 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-7900X-$393 19,432 User benchmarks, average bench 82% LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	78.9% Very good	Memory 70.2 1-Core 108 2-Core 236 75% 138 Pts	4-Core 468 8-Core 953 84% 711 Pts	64-Core 1,695 105% 1,695 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 78.9% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Asus(1043 85EA) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	105% Outstanding	Lighting 132 Reflection 163 Parallax 169 107% 154 fps	MRender 119 Gravity 148 Splatting 114 103% 127 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150 38,097 User benchmarks, average bench 241% 417GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	201% Outstanding	Read 1,749 Write 1,368 Mixed 1,281 326% 1,466 MB/s	4K Read 24.5 4K Write 33.9 4K Mixed 25.9 88% 28.1 MB/s	DQ Read 505 DQ Write 416 DQ Mixed 108 177% 343 MB/s
Poor: 157% ↑ This bench: 201% Great: 302%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150 38,097 User benchmarks, average bench 241% 229GB free Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	199% Outstanding	Read 1,755 Write 1,388 Mixed 1,251 325% 1,465 MB/s	4K Read 24.4 4K Write 30.6 4K Mixed 20 79% 25 MB/s	DQ Read 453 DQ Write 476 DQ Mixed 13.1 134% 314 MB/s
Poor: 157% ↑ This bench: 199% Great: 302%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 91GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 9151 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 257 (B1) Unknown 99 99 7 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 58 32 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 39 (F1) Unknown 99 99 8884568922	82.7% Excellent	Read 504 Write 405 Mixed 419 98% 443 MB/s	4K Read 24 4K Write 30 4K Mixed 28 88% 27.3 MB/s	DQ Read 260 DQ Write 196 DQ Mixed 14.5 69% 157 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 82.7% Great: 134%
WD Red 6TB (2014)-$125 11,340 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 501GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 198 197 9100 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1471 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 1508 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 0 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 3179 (C2) HDA temperature 121 112 31 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	56.3% Above average	Read 106 Write 90.2 Mixed 92.2 72% 96 MB/s	4K Read 0.77 4K Write 2.36 4K Mixed 0.2 98% 1.11 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 56.3% Great: 99%
Samsung Flash Drive 128GB 4,330 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 52GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	16.9% Very poor	Read 37.4 Write 36.6 Mixed 28.1 43% 34 MB/s	4K Read 2.83 4K Write 0.93 4K Mixed 0.67 65% 1.48 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 16.9% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 3000 C15 8x16GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 115% 8 of 8 slots used 128GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	86.1% Excellent	MC Read 27.5 MC Write 46.8 MC Mixed 28.9 98% 34.4 GB/s	SC Read 6.4 SC Write 19.9 SC Mixed 9.5 34% 11.9 GB/s	Latency 101 40% 101 ns
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 86.1% Great: 141%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X299-DELUXE Builds (Compare 1,069 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 103%

UFO

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 104%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X299-DELUXE - $179

CPU
Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples	267x
Core i9-7900XIntel $393Bench 82%, 19,432 samples	255x
Core i7-7800XIntel $216Bench 78%, 22,334 samples	130x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	258x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	73x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	72x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	59x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	53x
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $139Bench 266%, 63,520 samples	44x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $127Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	46x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GBCorsairBench 87%, 76,101 samples	20x
Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C15 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 91%, 1,779 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $1,261

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $490	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16