Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 51% Yacht	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	11.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	85.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

11 months ago, 7 months ago.

System	Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX505DT
Memory	9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210128
Uptime	1.6 Days
Run Date	Sep 24 '23 at 05:53
Run Duration	138 Seconds
Run User	IND-User
Background CPU	55%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H 57,853 User benchmarks, average bench 53% FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	47.7% Average	Memory 47.6 1-Core 67.1 2-Core 126 45% 80.1 Pts	4-Core 257 8-Core 398 40% 328 Pts	64-Core 436 27% 436 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 47.7% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics 115,953 User benchmarks, average bench 10% Asus(1043 18F1) 128MB Ram: 128MB, Driver: 20.10.32 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	11.4% Very poor	Lighting 14 Reflection 13.7 Parallax 20.7 11% 16.1 fps	MRender 11.4 Gravity 16.2 Splatting 13.6 11% 13.7 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 11.4% Great: 13%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1002 256GB 16,774 User benchmarks, average bench 141% 166GB free (System drive) Firmware: 20110000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 347 330 275 292 285 263 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	85.5% Excellent	Read 503 Write 412 Mixed 439 SusWrite 299 93% 413 MB/s	4K Read 18 4K Write 52.8 4K Mixed 16.3 76% 29 MB/s	DQ Read 566 DQ Write 542 DQ Mixed 556 417% 554 MB/s
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 85.5% Great: 187%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB 294,991 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 858GB free Firmware: 04.01A04 SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 85 88 88 88 88 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	50.4% Above average	Read 87.4 Write 65.6 Mixed 45.1 SusWrite 87.6 52% 71.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 3.6 4K Mixed 0.5 139% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 50.4% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD Kingston KHX2400C14S4/8G 16GB 67 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2667, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	58% Above average	MC Read 22 MC Write 22.5 MC Mixed 23.1 64% 22.5 GB/s	SC Read 12.3 SC Write 12.6 SC Mixed 13 36% 12.6 GB/s	Latency 243 16% 243 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 58% Great: 83%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 30: 0P 3R 3G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
30%	18%	65	137	4	120	15.5"	1280 720	NCP0036

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT Builds (Compare 2,827 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Raft

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT

CPU
Ryzen 5 3550HAMDBench 53%, 57,853 samples	1,843x
Ryzen 7 3750HAMDBench 54%, 42,271 samples	984x

GPU
GTX 1650 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 41%, 92,838 samples	1,364x
Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples	951x
Radeon RX Vega 10 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 37,264 samples	511x

SSD
Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GBBench 149%, 29,713 samples	1,161x
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GBBench 121%, 26,870 samples	408x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	380x

RAM
HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 48,644 samples	591x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 1x8GBMicronBench 44%, 28,935 samples	377x
HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 2x8GBHynixBench 76%, 29,128 samples	137x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16