Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS WIFI II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics19.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
8 months ago, 8 months ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS WIFI II  (all builds)
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230814
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 24 '23 at 01:24
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700G-$160
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
99.6% Outstanding
Memory 72
1-Core 169
2-Core 342
101% 194 Pts
4-Core 680
8-Core 1198
113% 939 Pts
64-Core 1,500
93% 1,500 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 99.6%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
Asus(1043 8809) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.40.46
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
19.1% Very poor
Lighting 24.4
Reflection 20.7
Parallax 33.3
20% 26.1 fps
MRender 13
Gravity 28
Splatting 22.2
18% 21.1 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 19.1%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Inland SATA SSD 256GB
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U1013A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 104 64 36 64 36 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
56.4% Above average
Read 505
Write 424
Mixed 110
SusWrite 84.4
62% 281 MB/s
4K Read 21.8
4K Write 92.3
4K Mixed 2.7
85% 38.9 MB/s
DQ Read 119
DQ Write 236
DQ Mixed 0.4
51% 118 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-2400C15-4GVR 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70.9% Very good
MC Read 26.9
MC Write 24.7
MC Mixed 23.8
72% 25.1 GB/s
SC Read 21
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 22.3
67% 23.3 GB/s
Latency 94.5
42% 94.5 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 50 15 0 36.1" 1280 720 ONN0077 onn. TV
Typical TUF GAMING B550-PLUS WIFI II Builds (Compare 1,849 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS WIFI II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 118% - Outstanding Total price: $469
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback