HP ProDesk 400 G6 MT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP ProDesk 400 G6 MT  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8599
Memory12.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230621
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 23 '23 at 08:52
Run Duration212 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700-$243
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Memory 77.5
1-Core 113
2-Core 243
79% 144 Pts
4-Core 485
8-Core 842
80% 663 Pts
64-Core 888
55% 888 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 99%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SKC3000S512G 512GB
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EIFK31.6
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,869
Write 2,159
Mixed 1,357
401% 1,795 MB/s
4K Read 37.2
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 58.3
205% 78.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,067
DQ Write 922
DQ Mixed 794
650% 928 MB/s
Poor: 184% Great: 451%
Samsung MZVLQ512HALU-000H1 512GB
476GB free
Firmware: HPS4NFXV
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1203 1229 1260 770 323 320 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
231% Outstanding
Read 1,304
Write 1,268
Mixed 1,145
SusWrite 851
257% 1,142 MB/s
4K Read 52.6
4K Write 168
4K Mixed 78.9
270% 99.8 MB/s
DQ Read 910
DQ Write 1,017
DQ Mixed 926
708% 951 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 231%
Great: 225%
WD Elements 25A1 1.5TB
803GB free, PID 25a1
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 38 38 38 37 38 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
22.7% Poor
Read 39.3
Write 39.5
Mixed 29.9
SusWrite 37.6
50% 36.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.9
130% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA82GU6JJR8N-VK - [0x9B85] CT16G4DFRA266.C16FE 32GB
2667, 2667 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
84.6% Excellent
MC Read 32.8
MC Write 34.9
MC Mixed 26.7
90% 31.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 27.8
SC Mixed 22.1
61% 21.4 GB/s
Latency 85.3
47% 85.3 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 43 36 0 0" 1280 720
Typical ProDesk 400 G6 MT Builds (Compare 456 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 400 G6 MT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback