Asus Maximus IV Extreme-Z

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 109%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (99th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 1 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics112% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Maximus IV Extreme-Z  (all builds)
Memory21.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121109
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateDec 24 '17 at 21:50
Run Duration85 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
96.1% Outstanding
Memory 97.9
1-Core 138
2-Core 276
95% 171 Pts
4-Core 514
8-Core 695
77% 605 Pts
64-Core 703
44% 703 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 96.1%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
EVGA(3842 6282) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2151 MHz, MLim: 2652 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.43
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Lighting 156
Reflection 24.1
Parallax 150
127% 110 fps
MRender 123
Gravity 99.3
Splatting 117
93% 113 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 112%
Great: 110%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel CascadeRaid 240GB
161GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
106% Outstanding
Read 879
Write 429
Mixed 529
135% 612 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 8.86
113% 50.5 MB/s
DQ Read 199
DQ Write 383
DQ Mixed 9.5
87% 197 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown IMT451U6MFR8Y-DC0 029E CMY16GX3M2A2400C11 0898 IMT451U6MFR8Y-DC0 029E CMY16GX3M2A2400C11 24GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
82.1% Excellent
MC Read 30.3
MC Write 29
MC Mixed 25.6
81% 28.3 GB/s
SC Read 24.3
SC Write 24.3
SC Mixed 26.5
72% 25 GB/s
Latency 46.5
86% 46.5 ns
Poor: 82%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Maximus IV Extreme-Z Builds (Compare 407 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus Maximus IV Extreme-Z

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $734
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback